Feeds:
Posts
Comments

Some excerpts

Dawn hasn’t broken yet. Cats shrieking. The echo of the muezzin from the loudspeakers from the mosque across the street, down the street, across the city. Cold creeping in between the shutters, damp and watery, as if the Mediterranean had flooded and was seeping in slowly underneath the doors, before the day burst in and melted it all—darkness, mist, and cold—in lash of the Egyptian sun. You throw the covers off and step onto the Greek-knotted balcony. A few lights. Some stars. The dry smell of the desert slapping the heavy breaths of the Mediterranean. It is the hour of the fagr, the morning prayer before dawn.

God is Great! God is Great!

Four times in the beginning, God is Great, and twice at the end, God is Great! God is Great! repeated five times a day, thirty-four times a day, the muezzins eject the phrase out into space. It screeches, it sings. The muezzins sing it out, they draw out the phrase, and the world knows. It warbles at first from the eastern end of the city, rising like a rush of wind, falling, rising, overlapping and never in chorus. The world sings with God is Great, and the people below the words scurry to prayer—some in the street, some in the back of the shops that have just sent their rusty, corrugated doors up, others in the mosques, the old men with long beards dyed with henna, the young men with shorter beards and leather jackets. God is Great!

The phrase in Arabic is Allahu akbar, which comes in shades of meanings: God is the greatest! He is the biggest! He comes into us and cannot be overtaken. He is everything! God is Great! No god but God! The deity himself is Absolute, and this Word made definite, without incarnation but with definition, the the added on in Arabic. No god (indefinite) but The God!

And the echo, it echoes, it reverbs through microphone effects, through the corridors tall with buildings, it bounces across pavement and iron and the streets until it reaches the innermost circles, the decay, the refuse, before tripping over the Corniche and emptying out onto the Mediterranean. God is Great, God is Great.

Quatrain 12

Door! You’re closed, and when will I enter?
I’ve been patient for so long — so long I’ve wanted to come in;
I’ve knocked for years only to hear the reply “Who is it?”
– If I knew who I were, Door, I would say and come in.

- Salah Jahin

Having some trouble with quatrain 17. Full text:

عجبتني كلمة من كلام الورق

النور شرق من بين حروفها وبرق

حبيت اشيلها ف قلبي… قالت حرام

ده انا كل قلب دخلت فيه اتحرق

One of the words on the page caught my eye,
The light rising from between its letters, flashing.
I loved this word, and carried it in my heart. It said: “Forbidden.
“This is me, through which every heart enters and is burned up.”

I am completely at sea on this one, and could use some advice as per the last two lines; I’m clear up until the ellipses, and then, owing to the lack of case markings, I have no idea what each part of speech is.

A hand, perhaps?

You out there, Mohamed?

Se(x)tarianism

I need to get off the Internet.

First: since we’re on the subject of gender studies, here’s an announcement from Meedan: the recently released movies, Rasayl al-Bahr (Letters of the Sea) and Ahasees (Emotions) are TWO movies making waves among critics for their portrayal of the “lesbian community” (there is a lesbian community?) in Egypt (in Egypt?).

Unrelated:

This is a whole other rant, which I will continue tomorrow. Read, and be outraged.

Islamists want to prohibit non-Muslims from referring to God as Allah

I need to get off the internet. It just makes me angry.

I redirect you, Noble Reader, to Sociological Images, a website I’ve been following for some time. The following link is actually pretty offensive, as it includes a YouTube clip of Bill Maher’s “Burqa Fashion Show.” For those of you with the stomach for culturally insensitive (though pretty clever) humor, watch away. However, I would like to point out SI’s commentary, which I applaud:

Taken from "PostSecret"

The comedy is tasteless, at best. And it brings out two interesting assumptions: that measures of women’s liberation include (1) the right to show skin and/or your body’s shape and (2) the choice to express your individuality through your clothes.

But I do think it prompts us to interrogate our own assumptions about what women’s liberation looks like and if being able to choose your own style really is a good measure of it.

I’d bet that most Western women feel like being able to choose her clothes is a central part of her sense of freedom. Does that translate in this context? That is, if women were required to wear burqas, but could wear any burqa they like, does this mediate how oppressive the burqa seems to you? Conversely, does the seeming freedom that comes with choosing your clothes become less convincing once you think about it in this context?  I know this is tough to think about, but I think it’s an interesting thought experiment.

In the wake of my own statements about the Antwerp and French headscarf bans, as well as the flood of messages regarding the rather racy picture that I posted a week or so ago, I think this is a refreshing gulp of new air.

One of the things that I’m a big fan of is that SI’s statements throughout seem to highlight that most people have a knee-jerk reaction to the women’s liberation movement: one of the most-often repeated statements I’ve heard here from Egyptian women is that liberation, etc. requires the absolute right of the woman to choose between wearing the veil and not wearing it. I don’t agree with the statement that a woman needs to wear the veil to be a good Muslima, but I think the option and choice to do so should be applauded; just like saying a rosary every night or going to Mass every day isn’t a requirement of Catholicism, it sure as hell helps you to be a good Catholic.

Highlights (and scroll down in the links — the comments, for once, are worth reading)

“Lingerie as Liberating”: advertisement for a German lingerie commercial: woman admires herself in her unmentionables, only to cover herself up. The woman dresses up in lingerie, admiring herself, only to cover up in a burka.  But she is still “hot” underneath, affirming the idea that looking “hot” is what makes women both happy and liberated.  The idea that a woman might want to be FREE from capitulating to the male gaze (even if just an imagined one) is left unexplored.

“Questioning Definitions of Freedom”: article from which the PostSecret image is snagged. The person who sent in the postcard suggests that she’s not sure which is worse: the rigid and extreme standard of beauty in the U.S. and the way that women’s bodies are exposed to scrutiny or the idea of living underneath a burka that disallows certain freedoms, but frees you from evaluative eyes and the consequences of their negative appraisals.

I wonder about this, actually. I wrote earlier last month (or at least hinted) if the veil weren’t a kind of sexual objectification of women’s bodies. Interestingly, SI’s article above seems to conflate the two standards: that Western ideals of feminine beauty are equally, if not more, oppressive than the perceived “Islamic objectification” of women.

And finally:

The Burqa, Fashion, and Measures of Freedom: again, I must stress that this video (which I’ve been leading up to) is pretty tasteless, though clever. SI’s commentary works well in complement with it.

Also: does anyone know if Zarinas.com is a legit burqa fashion website? Cause I totally want to get my little sister a camouflage burqa!

More fuel for the fire of discussion. As I tell my students in an overly enthusiastic voice, “GO!”

12 Women v. 3 Men

New course started yesterday, which has all the hopes and promises of being more fun than a barrel of monkeys. How do I know this?

Icebreakers.

I was anticipating having last term’s Proficient 4 students again, so my weekend was spent scouring the Internet for icebreakers and competitive activities to get everyone’s attitude about the new chapter nice and enthusiastic. I was expecting something small — four girls and poor Bassem — and lots of conversation. I even planned a few jokes about how their tests were awful (as I am currently in the process of grading them, and they are fantastic).

I did NOT, however, count on was that there would be about ten additional people there. Students I had never seen, met, or heard of before. I walked out of the classroom after putting my things down to get my requisite milk tea, only to return and find the little central room packed with hijabis. I practically had a heart attack.

Anyway.

Icebreakers were even more than helpful. What I originally intended to be an interesting way of secretively getting to know more about my original half-dozen girls turned into a genuinely dynamic activity — especially as I now have a couple of loudmouths in class (always a good thing). Here’s what we did:

1. Introductions. After remaining mysteriously silent for the first few minutes, I rearranged the room. People were naturally sitting next to their friends. I asked every other person if they knew the person to their right, and if they did, I moved them across the room. This, to start, was hilarious, if only because everyone got to laugh nervously with one another. Then, I put a number of questions on the board that I asked them to answer about the other person — and I gave them all of Eric Clapton’s “My Father’s Eyes” to prepare to introduce them to the class. These questions rated from the mundane (Name, place born, etc.) to the relatively clever (best molokhiyya you’ve ever ate, favorite dessert) to the philosophical (what is the most beautiful thing you can think of right now?). This time, I was smart and took notes, so I think I’ve already got names down pat. NB: Are these general tricks that all teachers learn?

2. Human knot. I then dashed the class into 1’s and 2’s and had them get into teams and explained “the human knot” to them. (For those of you that have never been to summer camp, that’s when you get in a shoulder-to-shoulder circle and hold hands with someone that is not next to you and have to untangle the ensuing “knot” of people. This exercise is great for getting people to give and take instructions in English, as well as its “funness”). Winners got chocolate.

For the boys, this was actually something of a problem. I had thought about the whole “touching” thing and thought that it wouldn’t be too much trouble (people shake hands, right?), but it proved to be an insurmountable obstacle for the gents. So, boys team! Worked just as well, and they had problems of their own to work out in the knot.

3. Two truths and a lie. More fun, obviously, if you’re a little tipsy, but works in this case quite well as a fast-track way of getting to know everyone. My forgot my own three statements, but I remember the counter argument to one: “You look like the kind of person that would jump off a train, sir.”

4. The last activity was of my own devising and was an amalgamation of a number of things I found on the internet. I had the students break into three groups of about five, and then agree on an answer to each of ten “blanks.” They could give me anything — especially if it was unusual — as long as they all agreed to it. The list included: a famous person, a place, a neighborhood, a weapon, three adjectives. Once they came up with it, I informed them that it was their happy task to then author a story based on the these responses. In retrospect, I should have had them switch lists and write each others’ stories, but the results were still hilarious.

Most of them wrote about Suzanne Tamim, who apparently is a Lebanese singer of recent notoriety, having been murdered on the docks of Dubai on the orders of her jealous husband when he found out she was two-timing him with another (gasp!) husband. I redirect you here for the full awesomeness of the story.

Last half-hour of the class we finally got around to the book, which incidentally was talking about books and reading. We had to cut class short, but damn: I really wished we could have kept going.

Nights like these are reasons why you love teaching.

Now in living color

Brief post before I’m out the door to be flabbergasted by the French Mass in San Katrine.

Rumi turned me on to this guy via Twitter this morning. Solid gold mine of absolutely amazing photographs of beloved Iskanderiyya. From the look of things, he also seems to live somewhere near Cleopatra (judging from his pictures of the Port Said square and his relative distance to Yonany and Clay).

Link here, which has been added to the roll of honor:

http://emadmaher.posterous.com/

Look, support, be amazed.

More later, peeps. I gots to goes.

Quatrain 27

Every thousand windows was two eyes open, watching,
When you and I were walking together, my love;
If we clung together, we might die from the rocks they threw
But if we parted, we might die from the grief of two.

- Salah Jahin

Quatrain 6

I saw many the Kingdom of Heaven that were busied
With each “Why?” and its because; and when I asked a question
It came back with more questions, and more questions still
And I left with my confusion greater than when I had entered.

Vanity!

- Salah Jahin

Quatrain 11

The treachery of Time, I told my heart, is that it is faithless;
And the day will come and you will need someone’s love, and faith;
And my heart trembled and asked, “What do I believe in?”
“What do I believe in…?” it asked angrily.
In what time told me.

- Salah Jahin

Older Posts »